Which of the following describes the reason the plaintiff believes the dating service was fraudulent?I. The owner paid one of his family members to go on a date.II. She got no dates from her membership in the service.III. The owner went on the date himself.IV. She had six bad dates.V. Her dates were rude to her.Multiple ChoiceIV and VIII and VII and IIIII onlyI only
Question
Which of the following describes the reason the plaintiff believes the dating service was fraudulent?I. The owner paid one of his family members to go on a date.II. She got no dates from her membership in the service.III. The owner went on the date himself.IV. She had six bad dates.V. Her dates were rude to her.Multiple ChoiceIV and VIII and VII and IIIII onlyI only
Solution
To determine the correct answer, we need to identify which statements describe the reason the plaintiff believes the dating service was fraudulent. Let's analyze each statement:
I. The owner paid one of his family members to go on a date.
- This suggests fraudulent behavior because it implies the service is not providing genuine dates.
II. She got no dates from her membership in the service.
- This does not necessarily indicate fraud; it could be a lack of matches.
III. The owner went on the date himself.
- This suggests fraudulent behavior because it implies the service is not providing genuine dates.
IV. She had six bad dates.
- This does not necessarily indicate fraud; it could be a matter of personal preference or bad luck.
V. Her dates were rude to her.
- This does not necessarily indicate fraud; it could be a matter of personal behavior.
Based on the analysis, the statements that describe fraudulent behavior are I and III.
Therefore, the correct answer is: I only
Similar Questions
The judge is concerned about potential fraudulent actions of the owner of the dating service. To try to understand whether fraud actually occurred, the judge begins to question the defendant. What question does the judge ask the defendant to determine whether the defendant's actions were fraudulent?Multiple ChoiceDid you invade privacy?Do you do background checks?Do you use the dating service?Did you commit fraud?IncorrectDid you input customer profiles?
Who did the plaintiff bring to court to sue?Multiple ChoiceHer coworker's boyfriend.Her ex-boyfriend.A man she went on a date with.Internet chat room service.Internet dating service. Prev
. Which of the following statements is true as to date? a. An undated instrument is considered to be dated as of the time itwas issued. b. The instrument is not valid forthe reason that it is ante—dated or post-dated, provided this is not done for an illegal or fraudulent purpose. c. The insertions of the wrong date avoid the instrument in the hands of the su bsequent holder in due course. . d. Where instrument or acceptance or endorsement thereon is dated, such is not deemed to be prima facie to be the true date of the making, acceptance or _ en dorsement.
The defendant offers which piece of evidence to show that if the plaintiff were unhappy, she should have taken action?Multiple ChoiceThe U.S Constitution.White-collar crime laws.Money-back guarantee.He offers no evidence.Antifraud statutes.
What are the two reasons why the services of an employee who has been engaged on probationary basis may be terminated?Group of answer choicesunauthorized caseunjust causejust causeauthorized cause
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.