Please consider the following data:This table shows the prevalence of asthma in relation to selected demographics in Australia.  The average expenditure for a person with asthma in Australia is $386 (Lartey et al., 2023).On average, urban workers receive 7.5% more income than rural workers, for the equivalent job (Ho, 2023) and cost of living expenses are 10% higher in rural Australia (APH, 2014)Based upon this graph, what conclusions can we make about social inequality in Australia if all other associated factors are equal?Pick the best answer:Question 3Answera.There is no inequality in healthcare in Australia, as we have medicare - a Universal healthcare systemb.More money (per person) should be spent on rural asthma prevention and treatmentc.This is largely a problem of Individual Determinants so inequality is not relevant hered.Asthma puffers are on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, so there is no inequality in prevention and treatment of asthma

Socio-economic inequality is regarded as:-Select one:a. When foreign powers occupy any stateb. When Communities’ tussle enhances within a statec. Disparities in wealth, resources and opportunities cause the above phenomenad. None of the above

Fill in the BlanksType your answers in all of the blanks and submit- current answer: <p id="">The graph that is used to depict income inequality, showing the percent of households along the &lt;blank&gt; axis and the percent of income along the &lt;y&gt; axis is known as the &lt;l&gt;curve.&nbsp;</p> <p id="">- br -</p> <p id="">If income were perfectly equally distributed within a country, the value of the Gini ratio for that country would be &nbsp;&lt;z&gt;.&nbsp;</p> <p id="">- br -</p> <p id="">The distribution of wealth tends to be &nbsp;&lt;more&gt; (more/less) unequal than the distribution of income.&nbsp;</p> <p id="">- br -</p> <p id="">The closer a Lorenz curve is to a 45-degree straight line, the more &lt;e&gt; (equal/unequal) the distribution of income.&nbsp;</p> <p id="">- br -</p> <p id="">A Gini coefficient of 0.80 would be considered a highly &lt;e2&gt; (equal/unequal) &nbsp;distribution of income.</p> <p id="">- br -</p>The graph that is used to depict income inequality, showing the percent of households along the blank - Word AnswerWrite your response here... axis and the percent of income along the y - Word AnswerWrite your response here... axis is known as the l - Word AnswerWrite your response here...curve. If income were perfectly equally distributed within a country, the value of the Gini ratio for that country would be  z - Numeric Answer. The distribution of wealth tends to be  more - Word AnswerWrite your response here... (more/less) unequal than the distribution of income. The closer a Lorenz curve is to a 45-degree straight line, the more e - Word AnswerWrite your response here... (equal/unequal) the distribution of income. A Gini coefficient of 0.80 would be considered a highly e2 - Word AnswerWrite your response here... (equal/unequal)  distribution of income.

You are required to choose one of the groups explored in Module 2 (those experiencing poverty, women, transgender people, Indigenous Australians, and sexual minorities) and compile a brief report offering: a broad snapshot of the key forms of disadvantage and injustice/inequality that this group experiences in Australian society (using statistics from two of the following contexts: socio-economic position, education, health, or criminal justice) a discussion on how this information illustrates disadvantage and inequality for this group, using at least two unit concepts discussed in Modules 1 and 2 (such as life chances, structural inequality, lottery of birth, white race privilege), which we use when we talk about inequality and disadvantage.

How might social inequality be seen to benefit society?

The typical Australian works less than 40 hours per week today and worked 49 hours per week in 1970. Does this fact make the economic wellbeing of Australians today versus 1970 higher or lower than indicated by the difference in real GDP per capita today versus​ 1970? a. The decrease in real GDP per capita between 1970 and today overstates the change in wellbeing because the value of leisure is not included in GDP. b. The decrease in real GDP per capita between 1970 and today understates the change in wellbeing because the value of leisure is not included in GDP. c. The increase in real GDP per capita between 1970 and today overstates the change in wellbeing because the value of leisure is not included in GDP. d. The increase in real GDP per capita between 1970 and today understates the change in wellbeing because the value of leisure is not included in GDP