Comparison of Proposed Strategies. • Two strategies have been proposed to alleviate the pressures caused by South East Queensland’s rapid Urbanisation. Option 1 Build a 3000-home development in Caboolture West with the aim of it, eventually becoming a satellite city. Option 2 Approve high density housing for all of Chermside West (15 to 25 storey buildings). • Evaluate the options using environmental, economic and social criteria. Consider the environmental, economic and social benefits (+) and weaknesses (-). Consider both long term and short-term effects for the two options.

Option 1: Building a 3000-home development in Caboolture West

Environmental:

• This option could potentially preserve the environment in other areas by concentrating development in one area.

• However, it could also lead to significant environmental disruption in Caboolture West, including habitat destruction and increased pollution.

Economic:

• This option could stimulate economic growth in Caboolture West by attracting new residents and businesses.

• However, it could also require significant upfront investment in infrastructure, such as roads, schools, and utilities.

Social:

• This option could provide much-needed housing and create a sense of community in Caboolture West.

• However, it could also lead to displacement of current residents and potential social inequality if the new homes are not affordable for a range of income levels.

Option 2: Approving high density housing for all of Chermside West

Environmental:

• This option could potentially reduce the environmental impact of urbanisation by concentrating development in existing urban areas.

• However, it could also lead to increased pollution and strain on existing green spaces in Chermside West.

Economic:

• This option could stimulate economic growth by attracting new residents and businesses to Chermside West.

• However, it could also lead to increased property prices and potential gentrification, pushing out current residents.

Social:

• This option could provide much-needed housing and potentially create a more vibrant, urban community in Chermside West.

• However, it could also lead to overcrowding, strain on existing community resources, and potential social inequality if the new housing is not affordable for a range of income levels.

In conclusion, both options have potential benefits and drawbacks. The best choice would likely depend on the specific circumstances and priorities of the South East Queensland community.