p → q is logically equivalent to ¬p ∧ q¬p ∨ q¬p ∨ ¬qp ∨ ¬q

The statement seems to be a mix of different logical equivalences. Let's break it down:

1. "p → q" is a logical implication which means "if p then q".

2. "¬p ∧ q" is a logical conjunction which means "not p and q".

3. "¬p ∨ q" is a logical disjunction which means "not p or q".

4. "¬p ∨ ¬q" is another logical disjunction which means "not p or not q".

5. "p ∨ ¬q" is another logical disjunction which means "p or not q".

However, these are not all logically equivalent. The correct logical equivalence for "p → q" is "¬p ∨ q", which means "if p then q" is logically equivalent to "not p or q". The other statements are not logically equivalent to "p → q".