In a prisoners’ dilemmaGroup of answer choicesplayers act rationally but the best possible outcome is not achieved for all playersplayers act irrationally and the best possible outcome is achieved for all playersplayers act rationally and the best possible outcome is achieved for all playersNone of the other answers are correct.players act irrationally but the best possible outcome is not achieved for all players
Question
In a prisoners’ dilemmaGroup of answer choicesplayers act rationally but the best possible outcome is not achieved for all playersplayers act irrationally and the best possible outcome is achieved for all playersplayers act rationally and the best possible outcome is achieved for all playersNone of the other answers are correct.players act irrationally but the best possible outcome is not achieved for all players
Solution
In a prisoners' dilemma, the correct answer is: "players act rationally but the best possible outcome is not achieved for all players."
Here's a step-by-step explanation:
-
The Prisoner's Dilemma is a standard example of a game in game theory that shows why two completely rational individuals might not cooperate, even if it appears that it is in their best interests to do so.
-
In this game, each player has two options: to cooperate with the other player, or to betray the other player. The highest total payoff for both players would be achieved if both players choose to cooperate.
-
However, each player, acting rationally and seeking to maximize their own payoff, has an incentive to betray the other player. If one player chooses to cooperate and the other chooses to betray, the betraying player gets a higher payoff.
-
As a result, in the equilibrium outcome of the game, both players choose to betray each other, resulting in a lower total payoff than if both had chosen to cooperate.
-
Therefore, the correct answer is: "players act rationally but the best possible outcome is not achieved for all players."
Similar Questions
Choose ALL correct answers:A prisoners' dilemma is a game in which:Group of answer choicesplayers cooperate in arriving at their strategies.all players have a dominant strategy.all players could be better off if neither chose their dominant strategy.both players choose their dominant strategies in the Nash equilibrium.None of the other answers are correct
In a prisoners’ dilemmaGroup of answer choiceseach player has a dominant strategyonly one player has a dominant strategythere are always two playerssetting a low price is always the best strategynone of the above
The Prisoners’ Dilemma is so named becauseGroup of answer choicesthe Nash equilibrium is one of the worst outcomes for the players.the game has no Nash equilibriumthe game is zero-sumplayers end up earning a lighter sentence than the prosecutor would like.
In a prisoners’ dilemmaGroup of answer choicestotal payoffs are maximisedeach player takes into account the negative impact they have on the other players in the gametotal payoffs are not maximised in the outcome of the gameit is difficult to predict what the players will actually do in the outcome of the gamenone of the above
In a prisoners’ dilemmaGroup of answer choicesThe best possible payoff is achieved for all playersNone of the other answers are correct.The worst possible payoff is achieved for all playersIt is possible that joint payoffs are maximised (the sum of the players' payoffs) provided they adopt a 'cooperative' strategy.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.