An exception(s) to the Exclusionary Rule is/are:Group of answer choicesProsecution can use evidence seized by police who acted pursuant to a warrant that later was found to be invalid but police reasonably believed the warrant was valid (good faith) AND illegally obtained evidence may be introduced at trial if the prosecutor can show the evidence would have been inevitably obtained in a legal mannerProsecution can use evidence seized by police who acted pursuant to a warrant that later was found to be invalid but police reasonably believed the warrant was valid (good faith)The defendant has committed many similar crimes and the current crime is the same type of crime so evidence can be used at trialIllegally obtained evidence may be introduced at trial if the prosecutor can show the evidence would have been inevitably obtained in a legal manner
Question
An exception(s) to the Exclusionary Rule is/are:Group of answer choicesProsecution can use evidence seized by police who acted pursuant to a warrant that later was found to be invalid but police reasonably believed the warrant was valid (good faith) AND illegally obtained evidence may be introduced at trial if the prosecutor can show the evidence would have been inevitably obtained in a legal mannerProsecution can use evidence seized by police who acted pursuant to a warrant that later was found to be invalid but police reasonably believed the warrant was valid (good faith)The defendant has committed many similar crimes and the current crime is the same type of crime so evidence can be used at trialIllegally obtained evidence may be introduced at trial if the prosecutor can show the evidence would have been inevitably obtained in a legal manner
Solution 1
The exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule are:
-
Prosecution can use evidence seized by police who acted pursuant to a warrant that later was found to be invalid but police reasonably believed the warrant was valid (good faith). This is known as the "Good Faith" exception.
-
Illegally obtained evidence may be introduced at trial if the prosecutor can show the evidence would have been inevitably obtained in a legal manner. This is known as the "Inevitable Discovery" exception.
The option stating that the defendant has committed many similar crimes and the current crime is the same type of crime so evidence can be used at trial is not an exception to the Exclusionary Rule. The Exclusionary Rule is about the legality of how evidence was obtained, not about the defendant's past crimes.
Solution 2
The correct answer is: Prosecution can use evidence seized by police who acted pursuant to a warrant that later was found to be invalid but police reasonably believed the warrant was valid (good faith) AND illegally obtained evidence may be introduced at trial if the prosecutor can show the evidence would have been inevitably obtained in a legal manner. These are known as the "Good Faith" exception and the "Inevitable Discovery" exception to the Exclusionary Rule.
Similar Questions
The exclusionary rule is a rule of criminal procedure stating that evidence obtained illegally cannot be used at trial.Group of answer choicesTrueFalse
One of the implications of the exclusionary rule is that it:Group of answer choicesit forces officers to gather evidence properlyIt is unlikely for a conviction if the officer follows appropriate proceduresallows the rights of the accused to be overlookedit explains the differences between probable cause and reasonable suspicion
Under what circumstances can the Good Faith exception be applied to the Exclusionary Rule?*A. When the police officer acted in bad faith.B. When the evidence was obtained through an illegal search.C. When the police officer believed their actions were legal.D. When the evidence is crucial to the case.
Which of the following is not an exception to the warrant requirement?Group of answer choiceshot pursuitexigent circumstancesexclusionary ruleplain-view doctrine
The exclusionary rule states thatGroup of answer choicesstate law cannot be applied in federal courts.evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court.federal law cannot be applied in state courts.the laws of one state court cannot be applied in the courts of another state.none of the above.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.