Read the following news published in the Hindu Newspaper and answer the following questions given below:The cost of misinterpreting inflation Globally, inflation is now the prime concern of governments, even as there is a speculation that a recession may not be far behind. In India, though government agencies regularly announce that the country is growing at a much faster rate than most economies and presently assert that inflation is much lower. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Shaktikanta Das said that the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) have not increased the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) in it’s third meeting with inflation persistently hovering above the upper tolerance limit of 6 per cent , the RBI’s six-member rate setting panel voted unanimously to raise the lending rate of the repurchase (repo) rate by 50 basis points to 4.90 per cent Das said.13.  …………. refers to minimum percentage of deposits of commercial banks to be kept with RBI. 1 pointSLRCRRRepo Rate 3Reverse Repo Rate14. What are the correct following methods to control excess demand?A. Decrease in government spendingB. Purchasing of securities from Commercial BanksC. Increase Repo RateD. Decrease CRR Choose the correct alternative: 1 pointAll of the aboveA, B and CA and CB and D15. When was RBI established?1 pointRs. 12 lakhs1st April 19341st April 19351st January 19491st April 192816. Repo rate relates to:1 pointShort – term borrowings by Commercial BanksLong – term borrowings by Commercial BanksDisinvestmentSale and purchase of government securities

RBI's role on controlling inflation

What happens when CRR is increased?a.Decrease in inflationb.Decrease in money supplyc.Increase in demand for moneyd.All of the above

At its meeting today, the Board decided to leave the cash rate target unchanged at 4.35 per cent and the interest rate paid on Exchange Settlement balances unchanged at 4.25 per cent.Inflation remains high and is falling more gradually than expected.Recent information indicates that inflation continues to moderate, but is declining more slowly than expected. The CPI grew by 3.6 per cent over the year to the March quarter, down from 4.1 per cent over the year to December. Underlying inflation was higher than headline inflation and declined by less. This was due in large part to services inflation, which remains high and is moderating only gradually.Higher interest rates have been working to bring aggregate demand and supply somewhat closer towards balance. But the data indicate continuing excess demand in the economy, coupled with strong domestic cost pressures, both for labour and non-labour inputs. Conditions in the labour market have eased over the past year, but remain tighter than is consistent with sustained full employment and inflation at target. Wages growth appears to have peaked but is still above the level that can be sustained given trend productivity growth. Meanwhile, inflation is still weighing on people’s real incomes and output growth has been subdued, reflecting weak household consumption growth.The outlook remains highly uncertain.The economic outlook remains uncertain and recent data have demonstrated that the process of returning inflation to target is unlikely to be smooth.The central forecasts, based on the assumption that the cash rate follows market expectations, are for inflation to return to the target range of 2–3 per cent in the second half of 2025, and to the midpoint in 2026. In the near term, inflation is forecast to be higher because of the recent rise in domestic petrol prices, and higher than expected services price inflation, which is now forecast to decline more slowly over the rest of the year. Inflation is, however, expected to decline over 2025 and 2026.The persistence of services inflation is a key uncertainty. It is expected to ease more slowly than previously forecast, reflecting stronger labour market conditions including a more gradual increase in the unemployment rate and the broader underutilisation rate. Growth in unit labour costs also remains very high. It has begun to moderate slightly as measured productivity growth picked up in the second half of last year. This trend needs to be sustained over time if inflation is to continue to decline.At the same time, household consumption growth has been particularly weak as high inflation and the earlier rises in interest rates have affected real disposable income. In response, households have been curbing discretionary spending and maintaining their saving. Real incomes have now stabilised and are expected to grow later in the year, supporting growth in consumption. But there is a risk that household consumption picks up more slowly than expected, resulting in continued subdued output growth and a noticeable deterioration in the labour market.More broadly, there are uncertainties regarding the lags in the effect of monetary policy and how firms’ pricing decisions and wages will respond to the slower growth in the economy at a time of excess demand, and while the labour market remains tight.There also remains a high level of uncertainty about the overseas outlook. While there has been improvement in the outlook for the Chinese and US economies, and many global commodity prices have picked up, geopolitical uncertainties, including those related to the conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine, remain elevated.Returning inflation to target is the priority.Returning inflation to target within a reasonable timeframe remains the Board’s highest priority. This is consistent with the RBA’s mandate for price stability and full employment. The Board needs to be confident that inflation is moving sustainably towards the target range. To date, medium-term inflation expectations have been consistent with the inflation target and it is important that this remains the case.Recent data indicate that, while inflation is easing, it is doing so more slowly than previously expected and it remains high. The Board expects that it will be some time yet before inflation is sustainably in the target range and will remain vigilant to upside risks. The path of interest rates that will best ensure that inflation returns to target in a reasonable timeframe remains uncertain and the Board is not ruling anything in or out. The Board will rely upon the data and the evolving assessment of risks. In doing so, it will continue to pay close attention to developments in the global economy, trends in domestic demand, and the outlook for inflation and the labour market. The Board remains resolute in its determination to return inflation to target.

Inflation rates are hitting multi-decade highs in some countries, prompting many central banks to increase interest rates.This is intended to help bring inflation under control by reducing people’s purchasing power, thereby lowering demand for goods and causing prices to fall.But central banks need to pace interest rate hikes – doing so too quickly could bring an economy to a standstill, but going too slowly means inflation could snowball.The US Federal Reserve has been the most aggressive with its interest rate hikes, while the European Central Bank has not yet raised rates.Graphic showing interest rate hikes vs. inflation rate, by country. Image: Visual CapitalistInterest rate hikes vs. inflation rate, by countryImagine today’s high inflation like a car speeding down a hill. In order to slow it down, you need to hit the brakes. In this case, the “brakes” are interest rate hikes intended to slow spending. However, some central banks are hitting the brakes faster than others.This graphic uses data from central banks and government websites to show how policy interest rates and inflation rates have changed since the start of the year. It was inspired by a chart created by Macrobond.How do interest rate hikes combat inflation?To understand how interest rates influence inflation, we need to understand how inflation works. Inflation is the result of too much money chasing too few goods. Over the last several months, this has occurred amid a surge in demand and supply chain disruptions worsened by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.In an effort to combat inflation, central banks will raise their policy rate. This is the rate they charge commercial banks for loans or pay commercial banks for deposits. Commercial banks pass on a portion of these higher rates to their customers, which reduces the purchasing power of businesses and consumers. For example, it becomes more expensive to borrow money for a house or car.Ultimately, interest rate hikes act to slow spending and encourage saving. This motivates companies to increase prices at a slower rate, or lower prices, to stimulate demand.Rising interest rates and inflationWith inflation rates hitting multi-decade highs in some countries, many central banks have announced interest rate hikes. Below, we show how the inflation rate and policy interest rate have changed for select countries and regions since January 2022. The jurisdictions are ordered from highest to lowest current inflation rate.Data on how inflation rate and policy interest rate have changed for select countries and regions since January 2022. Image: Visual CapitalistThe U.S. Federal Reserve has been the most aggressive with its interest rate hikes. It has raised its policy rate by 1.5% since January, with half of that increase occurring at the June 2022 meeting. Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve chair, said the committee would like to “do a little more front-end loading” to bring policy rates to normal levels. The action comes as the U.S. faces its highest inflation rate in 40 years.On the other hand, the European Union is experiencing inflation of 8.1% but has not yet raised its policy rate. The European Central Bank has, however, provided clear forward guidance. It intends to raise rates by 0.25% in July, by a possibly larger increment in September, and with gradual but sustained increases thereafter. Clear forward guidance is intended to help people make spending and investment decisions, and avoid surprises that could disrupt markets.Pacing interest rate hikesRaising interest rates is a fine balancing act. If central banks raise rates too quickly, it’s like slamming the brakes on that car speeding downhill: the economy could come to a standstill. This occurred in the U.S. in the 1980’s when the Federal Reserve, led by Chair Paul Volcker, raised the policy rate to 20%. The economy went into a recession, though the aggressive monetary policy did eventually tame double digit inflation.However, if rates are raised too slowly, inflation could gather enough momentum that it becomes difficult to stop. The longer high price increases linger, the more future inflation expectations build. This can result in people buying more in anticipation of prices rising further, perpetuating high demand.““There’s always a risk of going too far or not going far enough, and it’s going to be a very difficult judgment to make.””— Jerome Powell, U.S. Federal Reserve ChairIt’s worth noting that while central banks can influence demand through policy rates, this is only one side of the equation. Inflation is also being caused by supply chain issues, a problem that is more or less outside of the control of central banks.

Central banks around the developed world have been behaving in rather unexpected ways over the past few years. Take, for example, America’s Federal Reserve which has raised its bank rate on five separate occasions since the end of 2015 despite, the Federal Reserve’s preferred measure of inflation having fallen from 1.9 per cent to 1.3 per cent over 2017, well below the 2 per cent target.Conversely, in Sweden, the inflation rate has risen from 0 per cent in March 2014 to 2.3 per cent in September 2017, and yet between 2014 and 2016, the Swedish Riksbank’s key bank rate fell from 0.75 per cent to minus 0.5 per cent, where it remains.The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee, meanwhile, has stuck to the inflation targeting rule book much more closely, cutting bank rate to 0.25% in August 2016, when inflation was around 1 per cent, and raising it to 0.5% in November 2017 when inflation was above target at 3 per cent.Do the Federal Reserve’s and the Riksbank’s use of monetary policy imply that we are coming to the end of an era of inflation targeting? For example, are central bankers knowingly allowing inflation to stray well away from target because they are worried about broader economic and financial stability?This is not necessarily the case if we assume that policymakers are not setting bank rate based on current inflation but on the outlook for inflation perhaps 18 to 24 months in the future. Certainly, the Federal Reserve raised rates in 2015 and 2016 believing that inflation was heading back to target, but this is not the case unilaterally. For example, when the Bank of England cut bank rate in summer 2016, the Monetary Policy Committee’s minutes stated that: “The fall in sterling is likely to push up on CPI inflation in the short term ... probably causing it to rise above the target in the latter part of the MPC’s forecast period.”Perhaps a more worrying scenario is that central bankers no longer know what determines inflation. The expected relationship between unemployment and wage inflation as shown by the Phillips Curves has not held over recent years: unemployment has mostly fallen faster than forecast but wage growth has been lower than expected, perhaps reflecting the impact of technology and globalisation on wage rates. While the former would imply increasing inflationary pressures, the latter predicts the opposite: what are policymakers to do in light of such inconsistent messages?