Why do Wikipedians carefully review articles before adding to them? (And why should you do a similar review of others' work?)Group of answer choicesTo avoid inappropriate or off-topic information.To avoid sounding repetitive.To find out what can be added to the conversation.All of the answers are correct.
Question
Why do Wikipedians carefully review articles before adding to them? (And why should you do a similar review of others' work?)Group of answer choicesTo avoid inappropriate or off-topic information.To avoid sounding repetitive.To find out what can be added to the conversation.All of the answers are correct.
Solution
Wikipedians carefully review articles before adding to them for several reasons:
-
To avoid inappropriate or off-topic information: It's important to ensure that all content added to Wikipedia is relevant and appropriate. This includes avoiding any information that is off-topic or not suitable for the platform.
-
To avoid sounding repetitive: By reviewing the existing content, Wikipedians can ensure they are not repeating information that has already been included. This helps to keep the content concise and to the point.
-
To find out what can be added to the conversation: Reviewing the existing content also helps Wikipedians to identify any gaps in the information that they can fill. This could be additional details, a different perspective, or new research on the topic.
Therefore, all of the answers are correct. It's also important to note that these principles apply not only to Wikipedia but to any kind of collaborative work. Reviewing others' work helps to maintain a high standard of quality, ensure accuracy, and promote a comprehensive and balanced representation of information.
Similar Questions
What are three reasons college professors generally don't want you to cite a Wikipedia article in your paper?Group of answer choicesThey are too short, they are too popular, and they have too many pictures.They can be edited by anyone, they can be unreliable because they change over time, and they sometimes have shallow topic coverage rather than deep analysis of an issue.They cover topics that won't work for college research papers, they are never written by experts, and they contain too many links to other sources.
Why should you be careful when using Wikipedia as a source for a research paper?Multiple choice question.The information is not written by experts or fact checked.There is too much information to determine what to include in your paper.There isn’t enough information provided to get a good idea about your topic.The information is too confusing and complex to understand.
What are the most effective ways you can use Wikipedia to help you write a research paper?Group of answer choicesTo get specific information, to find credible scientific research from the most current sources, to get good images to use in a paper.To do research more quickly, to summarize more easily, and to get information from a wide variety of sources all at once.To get ideas for research, to find helpful links to other sources, and to find search terms that you can use in library research.Citations within the text.
Why is Wikipedia an unreliable source?A.It is written only by experts.B.The information is reviewed by trusted sources of authority.C.Its content does not change.D.The information is often not cited or verified.
The rationale for a student to do a literature review includes which of the following?Group of answer choicesIt helps the student to produce an A+ report.It helps the student to learn about the terms and concepts in the field or on the topic, and how best to communicate them.It helps the student to learn about the hardships involved in doing research.It helps to be efficient in student learning of the topic.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.