The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Philosophers starting from Socrates, who lived in the 5th century B.C., to Bertrand Russell of “Why I am not a Christian” fame, have fascinated me for a long time. The only reason for my fascination is that all of them used to think differently, mostly on abstract subjects such as “What is the purpose of life?” or “What is justice?” or “Why are we here?” Not only do they think differently, but also expose sophisms, spot fallacies and guide our reasoning. Philosophers spend many years, nay decades, honing their skills on thinking vertically or laterally. They use their own tools to regiment their thinking. Their main tools are inductive and deductive logic. Students who study logic as a subject know the intricacies of learning it.1) Philosophers from Socrates to Bertrand Russell have captivated me due to their unique approach to abstract questions about life and justice, excelling at identifying logical fallacies and guiding reasoning through inductive and deductive logic, which requires years of disciplined study.2) The fascination with philosophers like Socrates and Bertrand Russell stems from their unconventional thinking on concrete issues, using inductive and deductive logic that takes a lifetime to master and is primarily studied by students of logic.3) Philosophers, including Socrates and Bertrand Russell, are known for their distinct thinking on problems such as the purpose of life and justice, using sophisticated tools like inductive and deductive logic, which are difficult to learn with or without formal education.4) Philosophers from Socrates to Bertrand Russell intrigue me because they apply unique and practical reasoning to questions about life and existence as their study and use of inductive and deductive logic are essential for understanding the complexities of human thought which they have mastered over the years.
Question
The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.Philosophers starting from Socrates, who lived in the 5th century B.C., to Bertrand Russell of “Why I am not a Christian” fame, have fascinated me for a long time. The only reason for my fascination is that all of them used to think differently, mostly on abstract subjects such as “What is the purpose of life?” or “What is justice?” or “Why are we here?” Not only do they think differently, but also expose sophisms, spot fallacies and guide our reasoning. Philosophers spend many years, nay decades, honing their skills on thinking vertically or laterally. They use their own tools to regiment their thinking. Their main tools are inductive and deductive logic. Students who study logic as a subject know the intricacies of learning it.1) Philosophers from Socrates to Bertrand Russell have captivated me due to their unique approach to abstract questions about life and justice, excelling at identifying logical fallacies and guiding reasoning through inductive and deductive logic, which requires years of disciplined study.2) The fascination with philosophers like Socrates and Bertrand Russell stems from their unconventional thinking on concrete issues, using inductive and deductive logic that takes a lifetime to master and is primarily studied by students of logic.3) Philosophers, including Socrates and Bertrand Russell, are known for their distinct thinking on problems such as the purpose of life and justice, using sophisticated tools like inductive and deductive logic, which are difficult to learn with or without formal education.4) Philosophers from Socrates to Bertrand Russell intrigue me because they apply unique and practical reasoning to questions about life and existence as their study and use of inductive and deductive logic are essential for understanding the complexities of human thought which they have mastered over the years.
Solution
The summary that best captures the essence of the passage is:
- Philosophers from Socrates to Bertrand Russell have captivated me due to their unique approach to abstract questions about life and justice, excelling at identifying logical fallacies and guiding reasoning through inductive and deductive logic, which requires years of disciplined study.
Similar Questions
WHY Live for GOD and HOW: Short Readings and Reflections for Growing Christians by Daniel L. Espiritu Let me find answers to your spiritual questions in 'WHY Live for GOD and HOW', by how we affect Him. God gives us to live with or without life change or why I am here to stay for what. continue my statement
WHY Live for GOD and HOW: Short Readings and Reflections for Growing Christians by Daniel L. Espiritu Let me find answers to your spiritual questions in 'WHY Live for GOD and HOW', by how we affect Him. God gives us to live with or without life change or why I am here to stay for what. The book explores the reasons for living for God and provides short readings and reflections for growing Christians. It delves into the concept of how our actions and choices affect God. It also discusses the idea that God allows us to live with or without making changes in our lives and explores the purpose of our existence and why we should choose to stay committed to God. Please give me a thesis statement the last part.
Four alternative summaries are given below the text. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the text. Dust as we are, the immortal spirit grows like harmony in music; there is a dark inscrutable workmanship that reconciles discordant elements, makes them cling together. In one society. How strange that all. The terrors, pains, and early miseries, regrets, vexations, lassitudes interfused within my mind, should e’er have borne a part, and that a needful part, in making up. The calm existence that is mine when I am worthy of myself! Praise to the end!According to the poet, one can be worthy of oneself only when one has experienced the terrors and the pains of life and has grown above them to achieve a state of calmness.The mind fuses the past and the present in such a way that the calmness the poet feels at the moment is in a way amnesiac of the past; it is only because of this forgetfulness of the terrors of the past that the poet can be calm in the present. Dust we are and unto dust we will return; in the meanwhile, one must undergo all the pains and travails of life in order to become a worthy human being-- only then can one achieve a praiseworthy end.All the discordant elements in the poet’s life have gone into making him what he is now, and the calmness that he feels in the present is only because of having experienced the terrors in the past; this is what has made him a worthy human being.
Four alternative summaries are given below the text. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the text. Dust as we are, the immortal spirit grows like harmony in music; there is a dark inscrutable workmanship that reconciles discordant elements, makes them cling together. In one society. How strange that all. The terrors, pains, and early miseries, regrets, vexations, lassitudes interfused within my mind, should e’er have borne a part, and that a needful part, in making up. The calm existence that is mine when I am worthy of myself! Praise to the end!According to the poet, one can be worthy of oneself only when one has experienced the terrors and the pains of life and has grown above them to achieve a state of calmness.All the discordant elements in the poet’s life have gone into making him what he is now, and the calmness that he feels in the present is only because of having experienced the terrors in the past; this is what has made him a worthy human being.The mind fuses the past and the present in such a way that the calmness the poet feels at the moment is in a way amnesiac of the past; it is only because of this forgetfulness of the terrors of the past that the poet can be calm in the present. Dust we are and unto dust we will return; in the meanwhile, one must undergo all the pains and travails of life in order to become a worthy human being-- only then can one achieve a praiseworthy end.
Four alternative summaries are given below the text. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the text. Dust as we are, the immortal spirit grows like harmony in music; there is a dark inscrutable workmanship that reconciles discordant elements, makes them cling together. In one society. How strange that all. The terrors, pains, and early miseries, regrets, vexations, lassitudes interfused within my mind, should e’er have borne a part, and that a needful part, in making up. The calm existence that is mine when I am worthy of myself! Praise to the end!The mind fuses the past and the present in such a way that the calmness the poet feels at the moment is in a way amnesiac of the past; it is only because of this forgetfulness of the terrors of the past that the poet can be calm in the present. All the discordant elements in the poet’s life have gone into making him what he is now, and the calmness that he feels in the present is only because of having experienced the terrors in the past; this is what has made him a worthy human being.Dust we are and unto dust we will return; in the meanwhile, one must undergo all the pains and travails of life in order to become a worthy human being-- only then can one achieve a praiseworthy end.According to the poet, one can be worthy of oneself only when one has experienced the terrors and the pains of life and has grown above them to achieve a state of calmness.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.