What counterargument did the four dissenting justices offer in the case of Citizens United in 2010?Multiple ChoiceThey argued that there was no constitutional provision limiting marriage to only a man and a woman.They insisted that the Court had an obligation to review a president's public statements and use them for context in ruling on his public policy statements.They claimed that the First Amendment allowed for unlimited campaign spending by corporations and unions.They argued that corporations and unions are not what the framers had in mind in when referring to “the people” in the First Amendment.They insisted that if the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech.

Multiple Choice QuestionWhich statement below accurately reflects the minority opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission? The minority opinion was that Blank______.Multiple choice question.corporations were not meant to be part of the we in "We the People," and thus are not directly protected by the Constitutionalthough corporations did have "personhood," they were not citizens, and thus could not donate to political campaignsthe case should have been thrown out because corporations cannot have legal standing because they cannot truly be hurtNeed help? Review these concept resources.

Multiple Choice QuestionWhich statement below accurately summarizes the majority opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission? A majority of the Supreme Court justices ruled that Blank______.Multiple choice question.corporations could give to political campaigns but only if the donation was first approved by a shareholder votecorporations are not protected by the Constitution since they are not peoplelaws that limited corporate and union spending on political campaigns were unconstitutionalcorporations could not contribute directly to political campaigns, but they could give money to individuals, who in turn, could contribute the moneyNeed help? Review these concept resources.

Who argued that "A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse or rest on inference"?Multiple choice question.George WashingtonThomas JeffersonJames MadisonJohn Adams

Question 5 of 15Which statement from the dissenting opinion of Tinker v. Des Moines court decision best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protesters was not within the protection of the free speech clause of the First Amendment?A.This case, therefore, wholly without constitutional reasons, in my judgment, subjects all the public schools in the country to the whims and caprices of their loudest-mouthed, but maybe not their brightest, students.B.In Cox v. Louisiana, the Court clearly stated that the rights of free speech and assembly "do not mean that everyone with opinions or beliefs to express may address a group at any public place and at any time."C.Even a casual reading of the record shows that this armband did divert students' minds from their regular lessons, and that talk, comments, etc., made John Tinker "self-conscious" in attending school with his armband.D.There is also evidence that a teacher of mathematics had his lesson period practically "wrecked," chiefly by disputes with Mary Beth Tinker, who wore her armband for her "demonstration."SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS

Read the following summary of the Supreme Court majority opinion in the Tinker v. Des Moines case:Two students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district suspended the students. The Supreme Court determined that wearing the armbands is an expression of free speech, protected by the First Amendment, and it was not disruptive in the school setting. In addition, the school had allowed other students to wear controversial symbols without suspension.If a Supreme Court justice were to disagree with the majority opinion, which issue would be most important in forming the dissent?A.The two students in question were under the age of 18.B.There is precedent for schools limiting student expression.C.The district feared, but could not prove, that the armbands caused disruption.D.None of the other students were bothered by the armbands.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS