The following argument is a deductive argument. 1)Identify whether it is valid or invalid. 2) Identify the form of the argument.Either Seattle or Spokane is in Washington. Seattle is not in Washington. Therefore, Spokane is in Washington.Group of answer choicesInvalid, denying the antecedentvalid, modus tollensValid, disjunctive syllogismValid, hypothetical syllogism
Question
The following argument is a deductive argument. 1)Identify whether it is valid or invalid. 2) Identify the form of the argument.Either Seattle or Spokane is in Washington. Seattle is not in Washington. Therefore, Spokane is in Washington.Group of answer choicesInvalid, denying the antecedentvalid, modus tollensValid, disjunctive syllogismValid, hypothetical syllogism
Solution
The argument is a deductive one. Here are the steps to identify its validity and form:
-
Validity: The argument is valid. This is because the premises necessarily lead to the conclusion. If either Seattle or Spokane is in Washington, and it's stated that Seattle is not in Washington, then it must be true that Spokane is in Washington.
-
Form of the argument: The argument is in the form of a Disjunctive Syllogism. This form of argument involves a "either...or..." statement (either Seattle or Spokane is in Washington), followed by the negation of one of the disjuncts (Seattle is not in Washington), leading to the conclusion that the other disjunct must be true (Therefore, Spokane is in Washington).
So, the answer is "Valid, disjunctive syllogism".
Similar Questions
hen presenting an assertion through deductive reasoning, you should avoid arguments.Group of answer choicesFalseTrue
Which option is an example of deductive reasoning?A.Carrots are orange. Oranges are orange. Therefore, oranges are carrots.B.Continents are large. Africa is a continent. Therefore, Africa is large.C.Ty gets in trouble weekly. Therefore, he will get in trouble this week.D.Tim always wears a hat. Therefore, he will not wear a hat tomorrow.SUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
Which option is an example of deductive reasoning?A.Cities are populated. Chicago is a city. Therefore, Chicago is populated.B.I always get tired at 3 o'clock. Therefore, I will get tired at 3 o'clock today.C.Carrots are orange. Oranges are orange. Therefore, oranges are carrots.D.Tim always wears a hat. Therefore, he will not wear a hat tomorrow.
Identify whether the following argument is deductive or inductive. If it is deductive, identify whether it is valid or invalid. If it is inductive, identify whether it is strong or weak. Either Bill Clinton or George W. Bush was president when the World Trade Center towers were destroyed. But Bush was not president at that time. Therefore, Bill Clinton was president when those buildings were destroyed.Group of answer choicesInductive, strongInductive, weakDeductive, validDeductive invalid
Evaluate this Deductive argument:If it is sunny, I will wear sandals. It is not sunny. Therefore, I will not wear sandals.Group of answer choicesCould be eitherValidInvalid
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.