If a wetland provides 40 million dollars of ecosystem services, and benefit of filling it in for economic activity is 30 million dollars, it shows the importance of ______.

The number of ecosystems in an area is known as ecosystem ______.

1 .Environmental sustainability might not be immediately profitable, but it may provide _______-term value that’s worth prioritizing.ShortMediumLongBasic

Select the correct answer.Which of the following statements best summarizes the passage? A. Recreational activities in nature have both personal and financial value, which should inform land management decisions. B. It has been estimated that the societal value of recreational activities across all national forests is $14 billion annually. C. Cutting costs in regard to land management and use is a challenge because people hold opposing opinions about land's value. D. When considering land management, it is important to look at recreation as well as critical infrastructure such as roads.

If an economist wanted to include the loss of wetlands in their measurements of the economic wellbeing of their country what indicator should they use?Human Disturbance IndexHuman Development IndexGross National Happiness IndicatorGenuine Progress indicatorIndex of Sustainable Economic Welfare

Wetlands offer a diversity of benefits. They provide a habitat for wildlife, spawning grounds for U.S. commercial fish, and renewable timber resources. In the last 200 years, the United States has lost more than half its wetlands. Environmental Almanac gives the percentage of wetlands lost in each state in the last 200 years. For the 30 of the lower 48 states, the percentage loss of wetlands per state is as follows.45518755355924607189683845425093738905083305948355035272742Make a stem-and-leaf display of these data. (Use the tens digit as the stem and the ones digit as the leaf. Enter NONE in any unused answer blanks.)Percent of Wetlands Lost How are the percentages distributed? Is the distribution skewed? Are there any gaps? (Select all that apply.)The percentages are concentrated from 20% to 60%.There is a gap showing that none of the lower 48 states has lost from 10% to 19% of its wetlands.There is a gap showing that none of the lower 48 states has lost from 60% to 69% of its wetlands.These data are strongly skewed left.These data are fairly symmetric, perhaps slightly skewed right.The percentages are concentrated from 60% to 90%.There are no gaps in the data.