Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Let A and B be non-empty bounded subsets of R. DefineA − B := {a − b : a ∈ A, b ∈ B}.Prove thatsup(A − B) = sup A − inf B

Question

Let A and B be non-empty bounded subsets of R. DefineA − B := {a − b : a ∈ A, b ∈ B}.Prove thatsup(A − B) = sup A − inf B

🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

Step 1: Define the sets

Let A and B be non-empty bounded subsets of R. We define A - B as the set of all differences a - b, where a is an element of A and b is an element of B.

Step 2: Show that sup(A - B) is an upper bound for A - B

We know that for any a in A and b in B, a - b is less than or equal to sup A - inf B. This is because a is less than or equal to sup A and -b is greater than or equal to -inf B. Therefore, sup A - inf B is an upper bound for A - B.

Step 3: Show that sup(A - B) is the least upper bound

Now we need to show that sup(A - B) is the least upper bound for A - B. Suppose there is another upper bound U for A - B that is less than sup A - inf B. Then there exists an a in A such that a > U + inf B. Similarly, there exists a b in B such that b < sup A - U. Subtracting these inequalities gives a - b > sup A - inf B, which contradicts the assumption that U is an upper bound for A - B. Therefore, sup(A - B) is the least upper bound for A - B.

Step 4: Conclusion

We have shown that sup(A - B) is an upper bound for A - B and that it is the least upper bound. Therefore, sup(A - B) = sup A - inf B.

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Problem 6. Let A, B ⊆ R be nonempty and bounded sets.(a) Prove that if A ⊆ B, then inf B ≤ inf A ≤ sup A ≤ sup B.(b) Prove that sup(A ∪ B) = max{sup A, sup B}. (Hint: A is a subset of A ∪ B, so we canapply part (a) to these two sets.

Prove or disprove that (A ∪ B) − B = A − B for any sets A and B.

Let a, b ∈ R, and suppose that for every ε > 0, we have a ≤ b + ε. Show that a ≤ b.

Let X and Y be non-empty sets, and let h : X × Y → R be a bounded function.(i) Prove thatsupy∈Ysupx∈Xh(x, y) = sup(x,y)∈X×Yh(x, y) = supx∈Xsupy∈Yh(x, y).Hint) Interchanging the roles of X and Y if necessary, it is enough to prove thatsupy∈Ysupx∈Xh(x, y) = sup(x,y)∈X×Yh(x, y)

Let X and Y be non-empty sets, and let h : X × Y → R be a bounded function. Provethatsupy∈Ysupx∈Xh(x, y) = sup(x,y)∈X×Yh(x, y) = supx∈Xsupy∈Yh(x, y).Hint) By symmetry, we can interchange the roles of X and Y if necessary. Therefore, it isenough to prove thatsupy∈Ysupx∈Xh(x, y) = sup(x,y)∈X×Yh(x, y)

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.