Gregory is a businessman who lives abroad, but for the past 8 years, he has been sending money to his brother who lives in Koforidua to build a residential building of 9 floors in a small plot of land. He was hoping to maximize the space, which is why he opted for a multistory building. In the latest report he received from his brother, it was mentioned that the previous contractor had to leave in order to attend to some family issues. After about 1 year, the brother decided to give the contract to someone else since the previous contractor wasn’t giving any sign of commitment. After some time, he came to visit the site and realized that the building wasn’t right. A friend recommended you to him, to help him understand what went wrong. What would you tell him? Give at most 4 reasons to justify your opinion.

Chris, a carpenter, entered into a contract with Doug for the construction of a garage on Doug’s property for $5,000. Chris had constructed all of the garage, except the door, when he refused to complete the contract. Chris has substantially performed his part of the agreement, and would be entitled to payment of the contract price, less the amount necessary to finish the building.Group of answer choicesfalsetrueNext

Gregory is a six-month-old baby boy. He is learning about his environment through touching things, putting things in his mouth, and scooting around on the floor. According to Piaget, Greg is in which stage of cognitive Group of answer choicesA) PreambulatoryC) Concrete operationsB) PreoperationsD) Sensorimotor

make a detailed diagnosis about this: a design and build firm that specializes in commercial interior renovations is looking to expand its services and enter the residential remodeling market

Dream Home. Maurice finds a dream home on the lake. He wants to buy it but is unsure whether he can get a loan. He signs a contract with the seller that he will buy the home if he can get a loan. Maurice also includes a contractual clause in the contract with the seller that if the purchase goes through, but he loses his job within one year, the seller will repurchase the house for the same price Maurice paid for it. After getting a loan and buying the home, Maurice decided that he wanted new windows put into the home. He entered into a contract with a window contractor. The window contractor visited the home, but Maurice was always gone. The contractor made several attempts to reach Maurice, but Maurice would not return phone calls and made no attempt to assist the contractor with installation. The provision that the seller will repurchase the home if Maurice loses his job within one year of the sale is referred to as which of the following?Multiple ChoiceA condition subsequentA condition precedentAn implied conditionAn express conditionBoth a condition precedent and an express condition

The owner of a new office building contracted with a well-known landscaper to design and install landscaping around the building for $30,000. The agreement was memorialized in writing, was signed by both parties, and called for a budget of $5,000 for trees, shrubs, sod, and materials. The contract required the landscaper to complete the work within six months. Due to an unexpected increase in the price of trees and shrubs, the landscaper abandoned the project and never completed any of the work.Three years after the landscaper's deadline, the building owner sued the landscaper for breach of contract. In the jurisdiction, the statute of limitations for breach of a services contract is two years after the breach, and the statute of limitations for breach of a sale-of-goods contract is four years.Can the owner recover damages from the landscaper? A. No, because the contract is divisible with respect to the services and goods, and the landscaper's breach is therefore subject to the two-year statute of limitations. B. No, because the contract primarily calls for services, and the landscaper's breach is therefore subject to the two-year statute of limitations. C. Yes, because the landscaper's breach was a result of an increase in the price of goods, and his breach is therefore subject to the four-year statute of limitations. D. Yes, because the landscaper's breach was willful, and he is therefore estopped from denying that his breach is subject to the four-year statute of limitations.