Which of these is a statement of opinion?A.When more dust is in the air, there are higher rates of hospital admissions for asthma.B.Trees and plants release pollen into the air during certain times of the year.C.Working to decrease the amount of dust that people breathe is a waste of time and effort.D.Particles of dust from volcanic eruptions can travel hundreds or even thousands of miles.SUBMITExtras

Which statement from the article best supports the idea that even though dust might be harmful, it is sometimes good?A.Like the Amazon, [Hawaii] benefits from dust that blows in from elsewhere.B.Although we can't always see it, dust is everywhere.C.Within weeks, the ash from the volcano was spotted as far east as Russia.D.Water flowing from beneath glaciers is often milky instead of clear, because it's dusty.SUBMITExtras

Which of the following is a benefit from having lower levels of air pollution?Group of answer choicesLower levels of ambient noiseImproved cardiovascular and respiratory healthHigher incomeBetter relationships

True or False QuestionTrue or false: Your chances of dying from a heart attack, respiratory disease, or lung cancer are higher if you live in a city with high amounts of air pollution.True false question.TrueFalse

True or False QuestionTrue or false: Indoor air pollution is often higher than it is outdoors.True false question.TrueFalse

Multiple Choice QuestionWhat is the main argument industry and energy groups have used against the passage of clean air legislation?Multiple choice question.The proposed regulations do not do enough to make a difference in human health.Existing air pollution regulations have done little to improve air quality.Current technologies, whatever the cost, could not further reduce the amount of pollution released.The costs of meeting tighter air pollution standards is too high.