Assertion : 113 x 114 = 1112Reason : If a > 0 be a real number and p and q be rational numbers.Then ap x aq = ap + q.10. Assertion : Rational number lying between 14 𝑎𝑛𝑑 12 𝑖𝑠 38.Reason : Rational number lying between two rational numbers x and y is 𝑥+𝑦2 .11. Assertion : √5 is an irrational number.Reason : A number is called irrational, if it cannot be written in the form p/q, where p and qare integers and q ≠ 0.12. Assertion : 0.329 is a terminating decimal.Reason : A decimal in which a digit or a set of digits is repeated periodically, is called arepeating, or a recurring, decimal.13. Assertion : The rationalizing factor of 3 + 2√5 is 3 – 2√5.Reason : If the product of two irrational numbers is rational then each one is called therationalising factor of the other.
Question
Assertion : 113 x 114 = 1112Reason : If a > 0 be a real number and p and q be rational numbers.Then ap x aq = ap + q.10. Assertion : Rational number lying between 14 𝑎𝑛𝑑 12 𝑖𝑠 38.Reason : Rational number lying between two rational numbers x and y is 𝑥+𝑦2 .11. Assertion : √5 is an irrational number.Reason : A number is called irrational, if it cannot be written in the form p/q, where p and qare integers and q ≠ 0.12. Assertion : 0.329 is a terminating decimal.Reason : A decimal in which a digit or a set of digits is repeated periodically, is called arepeating, or a recurring, decimal.13. Assertion : The rationalizing factor of 3 + 2√5 is 3 – 2√5.Reason : If the product of two irrational numbers is rational then each one is called therationalising factor of the other.
Solution
Sure, I can do that. Here are the answers to your assertions and reasons:
-
Assertion: False. Reason: True. The rational number lying between 1/4 and 1/2 is 3/8, not 38. The reason is correct, the number between two rational numbers x and y is indeed (x+y)/2.
-
Assertion: True. Reason: True. √5 is indeed an irrational number because it cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers, which is the definition of a rational number.
-
Assertion: True. Reason: False. 0.329 is indeed a terminating decimal, but the reason given describes a repeating or recurring decimal, not a terminating one.
-
Assertion: True. Reason: True. The rationalizing factor of 3 + 2√5 is indeed 3 - 2√5. The reason is correct, if the product of two irrational numbers is rational then each one is called the rationalising factor of the other.
Similar Questions
Decimal representation of a rational number cannot be(A) terminating(B) non-terminating(C) non-terminating repeating(D) non-terminating non-repeating
Which one of the following is not a rational number:(a) 2 (b) 0 (c) 4 (d) 166. Which one of the following is an irrational number:(a) 4 (b) 3 8 (c) 100 (d) 0.647. Decimal representation of 15 is :(a) 0.2 (b) 0.5 (c) 0.02 (d) 0.0028. 33 8 in decimal form is:(a) 3.35 (b) 3.375 (c) 33.75 (d) 337.59. 56 in the decimal form is:(a) 0.83 (b) 0.833 (c) 0.63 (d) 0.63310. Decimal representation of rational number 827 is:(a) 0.296 (b) 0.296 (c) 0.296 (d) 0.296
All the following are true for irrational numbers except ...*1 pointthey have repeating decimalsthey are square root of prime numbersthey have nonterminating decimalsthey are square root of composite numbers without perfert squareOther:
The set of rational numbers has ........... and ........... decimals*1 pointnon-terminating and repeatingterminating and non-repeatingterminating and repeatingnon-terminating and non-repeating
Which of the following statements is true?Every irrational number can be represented as a fraction.Every irrational number can be represented with the help of decimals.Every rational number can be represented as a terminating decimal.Every rational number can be represented as an integer.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.