Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

Melody lives under an imputation tax system. Her income tax rate is 35%, which applies to all of her income, including wages, interest income and dividend income. Melody owns 500 shares of Orica Inc. Orica Inc. has 2 billion shares outstanding and had taxable income of $1 billion. If Orica’ corporate tax rate is 30% and its payout ratio is maintained at 60%. Assuming all dividends paid are fully franked, how much more tax need to be paid by Melody if she had lived under a classical tax system? (Round to the nearest two digits) Group of answer choices $29.25 $107.42 $187.20 $560.00 None of the other answers

Question

Melody lives under an imputation tax system. Her income tax rate is 35%, which applies to all of her income, including wages, interest income and dividend income. Melody owns 500 shares of Orica Inc. Orica Inc. has 2 billion shares outstanding and had taxable income of $1 billion. If Orica’ corporate tax rate is 30% and its payout ratio is maintained at 60%. Assuming all dividends paid are fully franked, how much more tax need to be paid by Melody if she had lived under a classical tax system? (Round to the nearest two digits)

Group of answer choices

$29.25

$107.42

$187.20

$560.00

None of the other answers

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

To answer this question, we need to first understand the difference between the imputation tax system and the classical tax system.

Under the imputation tax system, the tax paid by the corporation (Orica Inc.) is credited to the shareholders (Melody). This means that the dividends received by the shareholders are 'grossed up' to include the tax paid by the corporation, and the shareholders are then taxed on this grossed up amount, less a credit for the tax already paid by the corporation.

Under the classical tax system, the corporation pays tax on its profits, and then the shareholders also pay tax on the dividends received. This results in double taxation.

Now, let's calculate the tax Melody would have to pay under both systems.

  1. Calculate the total dividends paid by Orica Inc.: Taxable income = 1billionCorporatetaxrate=30TaxpaidbyOrica=1 billion Corporate tax rate = 30% Tax paid by Orica = 1 billion * 30% = 300millionAftertaxprofit=300 million After-tax profit = 1 billion - 300million=300 million = 700 million Payout ratio = 60% Total dividends = 700million60700 million * 60% = 420 million

  2. Calculate the dividends received by Melody: Melody owns 500 shares out of 2 billion shares Dividends per share = 420million/2billion=420 million / 2 billion = 0.21 Dividends received by Melody = 500 * 0.21=0.21 = 105

  3. Calculate the tax Melody would have to pay under the imputation system: Income tax rate = 35% Tax paid by Melody = 10535105 * 35% = 36.75

  4. Calculate the tax Melody would have to pay under the classical system: Under the classical system, Melody would have to pay tax on the full amount of the dividends, without any credit for the tax already paid by Orica. Tax paid by Melody = 10535105 * 35% = 36.75

The difference in tax paid by Melody under the two systems is 36.7536.75 - 36.75 = $0. Therefore, the answer is "None of the other answers".

This problem has been solved

Similar Questions

Maria makes $35,000 per year. After taking deductions and credits, Maria's total tax liability is $4,200. What is Maria's effective tax rate?Group of answer choices20%28%12%8.33%

If Theresa paid $5,000 in taxes last year on taxable income of $50,000, her effective tax rate wasGroup of answer choices0.1%10%20%1000%

You are a shareholder of ABC Corporation. The corporation paid a $0.7 fully-franked annual cash dividend per share. The corporate tax rate is 34%, and the personal tax rate on (both dividend and non-dividend) income is 41%. How much is the franking credit (per share) an investor would get under the imputation tax system? (Round your answer in dollars to 2 decimal places, e.g. put 1204.42 if your answer is 1204.4243.)

(a) In 2013, Mary worked for Company A. Her salary for the year was $18750. (i) $5625 of her salary was not taxed. What percentage of her salary was not taxed? Answer ....................................... % [2] (ii) The remaining $13125 of Mary’s salary was taxed. 22% of this amount was deducted for tax. Mary’s take-home pay was the amount remaining from $18750 after tax had been deducted. She received this in 52 equal amounts as a weekly wage. Calculate Mary’s weekly wage. Answer $ ......................................... [3] (iii) In 2012 Mary had worked for Company B. When she moved from Company B to Company A, her salary increased by 25% to $18750. Calculate her salary when she worked for Company B.

3 pointsSuppose John’s Income is Rs. 500. On this income, John’s pays 5% tax. Additionally, John receives Rs.60 from the government as a part of the government’s “Food for all” program. How much is John’s disposable income?

1/3

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.