What is the source of the myth that Windows is attacked more often than Linux?

The myth that Windows is attacked more often than Linux likely originates from a few key factors:

1. Market Share: Windows has traditionally had a much larger market share than Linux, especially in the personal computer segment. This makes Windows a more attractive target for attackers since the potential number of victims is much larger.

2. User Base: The typical Windows user might be less tech-savvy than the typical Linux user. This could make Windows users easier targets for attacks, as they might be more likely to fall for phishing attempts or download malicious software.

3. Perception of Value: Windows is often associated with commercial, for-profit activities, while Linux is often associated with open-source projects. This could lead attackers to believe that there's more to gain from attacking Windows systems.

4. Historical Precedence: In the past, Windows had more vulnerabilities and was less secure than it is today. This could have led to a reputation of being more prone to attacks, which persists even as the security of Windows has improved.

5. Reporting Bias: Attacks on Windows systems might be more likely to be reported in the media, due to the larger user base and the potential for greater impact. This could create the perception that Windows is attacked more often.

It's important to note that this is a myth. Both Windows and Linux have their own security strengths and weaknesses, and the security of a system also greatly depends on the user's behavior and the specific configurations and applications in use.