What is the advantage of using a full-wave bridge rectifier vs half-wave rectifier? Group of answer choicesSuitable for high voltage applicationsPeak diode current is doubledOnly requires two diodesFilter capacitor required is halvedPIV rating is doubledPeak diode current is halvedPIV rating is halvedCheaper to manufactureFilter capacitor can discharge more quicklySurge current reduces with filter capacitance

The advantages of using a full-wave bridge rectifier over a half-wave rectifier include:

1. Peak Inverse Voltage (PIV) rating is halved: In a full-wave bridge rectifier, each diode only needs to withstand half the peak inverse voltage compared to a half-wave rectifier. This is because the diodes work in pairs to share the voltage during each half of the AC cycle.

2. Filter capacitor required is halved: The output frequency of a full-wave rectifier is double that of a half-wave rectifier. This means that the filter capacitor discharges less between each peak, so a smaller capacitor can be used for the same amount of ripple.

3. Peak diode current is halved: In a full-wave rectifier, the current is shared between two diodes at any given time, reducing the peak current through each diode.

4. More efficient power transfer: A full-wave rectifier converts both halves of the input waveform to DC, unlike a half-wave rectifier, which only uses one half. This results in a higher average output voltage and more efficient use of the input power.

So, from your given choices, the correct ones are "Filter capacitor required is halved", "Peak diode current is halved", and "PIV rating is halved".