Knowee
Questions
Features
Study Tools

V.B Rangaraj vs. V.B Gopalakrishnan And Others Supreme Court Of Indiav. In this regard, we rely on the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of V.B. Rangaraj Vs. V.B. Gopalakrishnan and Ors. [(1992) 1 SCC 160], the relevant part of which are reproduced hereinunder: "These provisions of the Act make it clear that the Articles of Association are the regulations of the company binding on the company and its

Question

V.B Rangaraj vs. V.B Gopalakrishnan And Others Supreme Court Of Indiav. In this regard, we rely on the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of V.B. Rangaraj Vs. V.B. Gopalakrishnan and Ors. [(1992) 1 SCC 160], the relevant part of which are reproduced hereinunder: "These provisions of the Act make it clear that the Articles of Association are the regulations of the company binding on the company and its

...expand
🧐 Not the exact question you are looking for?Go ask a question

Solution

I'm sorry, but you didn't provide a question or a text to respond to. Could you please provide more information?

Similar Questions

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India is defined under which article of the Indian constitution?

The members in the Appellate Board shall be appointed by the consultation with the Chief Justice of IndiaOptionsCMPresidentMLAPM

The case of Shugaba v Ministry of Internal Affairs & Ors was primarily onQuestion 4Answera.Arbitration processesb.Declarative judgmentc.Jugdes\' ruled.Legal ethics

The judgement underscores the importance of legal compliance and the role of the courts in upholding the integrity of legal processes, particularly in the context of corporate insolvency. The case sheds light on the importance of adhering to specific laws governing legal proceedings in company matters, highlighting the need for compliance with statutory provisions. It contributes to ongoing legal debates surrounding the procedural requirements for initiating legal actions on behalf of companies in insolvency situations. The ruling underscores the significance of legal hierarchy and the supremacy of relevant statutory provisions in guiding legal actions in corporate contexts. The court clarified that when a specific law (in this case, the Companies Act 1965) has been enacted pertaining to any power or right relating to legal proceedings, that specific law shall prevail over any other similar laws (in this case, the Bankruptcy Act 1967, which the applicant had relied upon). Use and relate the points given and create a whole paragraph.

priya pramod gajbe supreme court case important compilation

1/1

Upgrade your grade with Knowee

Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.