What (amongst other things) is now considered unethical in Milgram’s experiments looking at obedience and authority?Select one:a.The ‘learners’ were given high voltage shocksb.The research participants (given role of ‘teachers’) did not know the ‘learners’ were actorsc.The participants were all maled.The participants responded to an advert
Question
What (amongst other things) is now considered unethical in Milgram’s experiments looking at obedience and authority?Select one:a.The ‘learners’ were given high voltage shocksb.The research participants (given role of ‘teachers’) did not know the ‘learners’ were actorsc.The participants were all maled.The participants responded to an advert
Solution
The answer is: b. The research participants (given role of 'teachers') did not know the 'learners' were actors.
This is considered unethical because it involves deception. In Milgram's experiment, the 'teachers' were led to believe that they were administering real shocks to the 'learners', when in fact the 'learners' were actors. This deception is considered unethical because it can cause psychological harm to the participants, who believed they were causing harm to others. Furthermore, it violates the principle of informed consent, which is a key ethical principle in research.
Similar Questions
In Milgram's original obedience experiment, subjects who were assigned the role of “teacher”:Group of answer choicesquickly figured out the learner was not really getting shockedwere told to stop whenever they felt the slightest discomfort about what they were doing.seemed to enjoy shocking the learner, especially at the higher voltage levels.were deceived about the real role of the “learner” and the level of shock that he actually received.
Which of the following is NOT an explanation that Milgram and others have emphasized in interpreting the basic results of his obedience studies? a. The conditions of the experiment caused people's aggressive tendencies, which are normally suppressed, to rise to the surface. b. Volunteers came into the experiment as products of a social world that trains people to obey legitimate authorities and to play by the rules. c. The experimenter acted in a self-assured manner and indicated that he was responsible if anything went wrong. d. The experimenter was closer than the learner, and hence a more potent social influence on the subject.
Which of the following was NOT shown to DECREASE obedience in the Milgram shock experiments?Question 5AnswerWhen the participant had to touch the learner to administer the punishment When the learner was in the same room as the experimenter When the participant believed the instructions came from another participant rather than an experimenter When the participants were male as compared to female When the participant saw others refuse to press the lever
In Stanley Milgram's experiment on the role of obedience, the .......... Was the subject who was being observed and did not know what the experiment was about or what was being studied;Question 12Select one:a.Teacherb.Experimenterc.Learnerd.Doge.Milgram
In Milgram's controversial study on obedience, nearly __________ of the participants were willing to administer what appeared to be lethal electrical shocks to another person because they were told to do so by an authority figure.Question 2Select one:a.1/3b.2/3c.3/4d.4/5
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.