Over the aeons, the capacity to gauge duration has correlated directly with increasing control over the environment that we inhabit. Keeping time is a practice that may go back more than 20,000 years, when hunters of the ice age notched holes in sticks or bones, possibly to track the days between phases of the moon. And a mere 5,000 years ago or so the Babylonians and Egyptians devised calendars for planting and other time-sensitive activities.Early chronotechnologists were not precision freaks. They tracked natural cycles: the solar day, the lunar month and the solar year. The sundial could do little more than cast a shadow, when clouds or night did not render it a useless decoration. Beginning in the 13th century, though, the mechanical clock initiated a revolution equivalent to the one engendered by the later invention by Gutenberg of the printing press. Time no longer ‘flowed’, as it did literally in a water clock. Rather it was marked off by a mechanism that could track the beats of an oscillator. When refined, this device let time’s passage be counted to fractions of a second.The mechanical clock ultimately enabled the miniaturization of the timepiece. Once it was driven by a coiled spring and not a falling weight, it could be carried or worn like jewellery. The technology changed our perception of the way society was organized. It was an instrument that let one person co-ordinate activities with another. ‘Punctuality comes from within, not from without,’ writes Harvard University historian David S. Landes in his book Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World. ‘It is the mechanical clock that made possible, for better or worse, a civilization attentive to the passage of time, hence to productivity and performance.’Mechanical clocks persisted as the most accurate timekeepers for centuries. But the past 50 years has seen as much progress in the quest for precision as in the previous 700. It hasn’t been just the Internet that has brought about the conquest of time over space. Time is more accurately measured than any other physical entity. As such, elapsed time is marshalled to size up spatial dimensions. Today, standard makers gauge the length of the venerable metre by the distance light in a vacuum travels in 1/299,792,458 of a second.Which of the following best describes the thought flow of the passage?Historical background, progress of technology, modern precisionProgress of technology, modern precision, historical backgroundModern precision, historical background, technological progressHistorical background, modern precision, technological progress
Question
Over the aeons, the capacity to gauge duration has correlated directly with increasing control over the environment that we inhabit. Keeping time is a practice that may go back more than 20,000 years, when hunters of the ice age notched holes in sticks or bones, possibly to track the days between phases of the moon. And a mere 5,000 years ago or so the Babylonians and Egyptians devised calendars for planting and other time-sensitive activities.Early chronotechnologists were not precision freaks. They tracked natural cycles: the solar day, the lunar month and the solar year. The sundial could do little more than cast a shadow, when clouds or night did not render it a useless decoration. Beginning in the 13th century, though, the mechanical clock initiated a revolution equivalent to the one engendered by the later invention by Gutenberg of the printing press. Time no longer ‘flowed’, as it did literally in a water clock. Rather it was marked off by a mechanism that could track the beats of an oscillator. When refined, this device let time’s passage be counted to fractions of a second.The mechanical clock ultimately enabled the miniaturization of the timepiece. Once it was driven by a coiled spring and not a falling weight, it could be carried or worn like jewellery. The technology changed our perception of the way society was organized. It was an instrument that let one person co-ordinate activities with another. ‘Punctuality comes from within, not from without,’ writes Harvard University historian David S. Landes in his book Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World. ‘It is the mechanical clock that made possible, for better or worse, a civilization attentive to the passage of time, hence to productivity and performance.’Mechanical clocks persisted as the most accurate timekeepers for centuries. But the past 50 years has seen as much progress in the quest for precision as in the previous 700. It hasn’t been just the Internet that has brought about the conquest of time over space. Time is more accurately measured than any other physical entity. As such, elapsed time is marshalled to size up spatial dimensions. Today, standard makers gauge the length of the venerable metre by the distance light in a vacuum travels in 1/299,792,458 of a second.Which of the following best describes the thought flow of the passage?Historical background, progress of technology, modern precisionProgress of technology, modern precision, historical backgroundModern precision, historical background, technological progressHistorical background, modern precision, technological progress
Solution
The thought flow of the passage best described is: Historical background, progress of technology, modern precision. The passage starts with a historical background of timekeeping, then moves on to discuss the progress of technology in timekeeping, and finally discusses the modern precision of timekeeping.
Similar Questions
We all carry our biological clock based on the time, lunar cycle, season, or year. True False
If, in the remote future, we establish a base on Mercury, keeping track of time will be a challenge. Discuss how to define a year on Mercury, and the two ways to define a day. Can you come up with ways that humans raised on Earth might deal with time cycles on Mercury?
Select all that applySelect all of the following that are true about molecular clocks.Multiple select question.They use the mutation rate of genes to determine the time of divergence from a common ancestor.They can be used to predict when new species are going to form in the future.They can be used to estimate when humans and chimps diverged from a common ancestor.They can be used in absolute dating of fossils.
If you equate all of the Earth's history to one calendar year, the history of our species (Homo sapiens) would occupyGroup of answer choicesthe week from Christmas to New Year's Eve.the time from December 15 to New Year's Eve.the time from December 31 at 3 P.M. to New Year's Eve.the last hour before midnight on New Year's Eve.
Why is the use of a molecular clock controversial?Multiple choice question.It is only useful in some species.It assumes that rates of evolution are different for different genes.It assumes that DNA divergence rates are constant over time.It does not incorporate information from the fossil record about the timing of evolutionary events.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.