Procopius of Caesaria was a 6th-century Roman historian retained by Emperor Justinian to chronicle military campaigns and write praise-filled verses on the emperor’s public works. While these commissioned writings paint Justinian in an overwhelmingly positive light, a collection of Procopius’s unpublished work called the Anecdota, discovered centuries later, contains much less flattering, often salacious details about the private lives of Justinian and his entourage. Consequently, many scholars have concluded that -------Which choice most logically completes the text?Justinian edited Procopius’s published works.eliminateThe Anecdota is a forgery.eliminateProcopius praised Justinian publicly but privately disliked his patron.eliminateProcopius did not author the works praising Justinian.
Question
Procopius of Caesaria was a 6th-century Roman historian retained by Emperor Justinian to chronicle military campaigns and write praise-filled verses on the emperor’s public works. While these commissioned writings paint Justinian in an overwhelmingly positive light, a collection of Procopius’s unpublished work called the Anecdota, discovered centuries later, contains much less flattering, often salacious details about the private lives of Justinian and his entourage. Consequently, many scholars have concluded that -------Which choice most logically completes the text?Justinian edited Procopius’s published works.eliminateThe Anecdota is a forgery.eliminateProcopius praised Justinian publicly but privately disliked his patron.eliminateProcopius did not author the works praising Justinian.
Solution
The most logical completion of the text would be: "Procopius praised Justinian publicly but privately disliked his patron." This conclusion is drawn from the contrast between Procopius's commissioned writings, which were positive towards Justinian, and his unpublished work, which contained less flattering details. This suggests that Procopius may have had personal reservations or negative feelings towards Justinian that he expressed privately, but not in his official capacity as a historian for the emperor.
Similar Questions
A historian is interested to learn whether a new biography about a Roman emperor is likely to be biased. Which piece of information would be helpful to her?A.A letter from the book's writer discussing how much he hates the emperorB.A secondary source that describes the emperor as somewhat incompetentC.A photograph showing the ruins of the emperor's enormous palaceD.A Roman primary source describing the emperor as arrogant and unkindSUBMITarrow_backPREVIOUS
By the end of the Second Punic War, who was writing histories in Rome?Group of answer choicesmembers of the eliteonly consulsGreek residents
why the sources for the Battle of Allia and the Sack of Rome are less credible than the sources for the Punic Wars
Which element of drama is Artemidorus - the Caesar loyalist? A. diction B. thought C. character
use the word skeptical to discribe julius caesar
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.