Avoidance of conflict may involve actual physical flight; for example, leaving the scene of the conflict (walking out of the apartment or going to another part of the office), falling asleep, or blasting the stereo to drown out all conversation. It may also take the form of emotional or intellectual avoidance, whereby you leave the conflict psychologically by not dealing with the issues raised. As avoidance increases, relationship satisfaction decreases (Meeks, Hendrick, & Hendrick, 1998). Sometimes avoidance is a response to demands—a conflict pattern known as demand–withdrawal. Here one person makes demands and the other person, unwilling to accede to the demands, withdraws from the interaction (Canary, Cupach, & Messman, 1995; Guerrero, Andersen, & Afifi, 2007; Sagrestano, Heavey, & Christensen, 2006). This pattern is obviously unproductive, but either individual can easily break it—either by not making demands or by not withdrawing and instead participating actively in conflict management.Although avoidance is generally an unproductive approach, this does not mean that taking time out to cool off is not a useful first strategy. Sometimes it is. When conflict is waged through e-mail or some social network site, for example, this is an easy-to-use and often effective strategy. By delaying your response until you’ve had time to think things out more logically and calmly, you’ll be better able to respond constructively, to address possible resolutions to the conflict, and get the relationship back to a less hostile stage. And there is some research that shows that as couples age, although they continue to experience the demand–withdrawal pattern, they avoid the conflict rather than confront it (Holley, Haase, & Levenson, 2013). And it seems to work for them. Similarly, in many cultures (and in many specific conflict encounters), avoidance—especially avoiding conflict in public—may be a face-saving strategy and may prove useful in resolving conflict and in preserving the relationship (Cai & Fink, 2002; Jandt, 2021).
Question
Avoidance of conflict may involve actual physical flight; for example, leaving the scene of the conflict (walking out of the apartment or going to another part of the office), falling asleep, or blasting the stereo to drown out all conversation. It may also take the form of emotional or intellectual avoidance, whereby you leave the conflict psychologically by not dealing with the issues raised. As avoidance increases, relationship satisfaction decreases (Meeks, Hendrick, & Hendrick, 1998). Sometimes avoidance is a response to demands—a conflict pattern known as demand–withdrawal. Here one person makes demands and the other person, unwilling to accede to the demands, withdraws from the interaction (Canary, Cupach, & Messman, 1995; Guerrero, Andersen, & Afifi, 2007; Sagrestano, Heavey, & Christensen, 2006). This pattern is obviously unproductive, but either individual can easily break it—either by not making demands or by not withdrawing and instead participating actively in conflict management.Although avoidance is generally an unproductive approach, this does not mean that taking time out to cool off is not a useful first strategy. Sometimes it is. When conflict is waged through e-mail or some social network site, for example, this is an easy-to-use and often effective strategy. By delaying your response until you’ve had time to think things out more logically and calmly, you’ll be better able to respond constructively, to address possible resolutions to the conflict, and get the relationship back to a less hostile stage. And there is some research that shows that as couples age, although they continue to experience the demand–withdrawal pattern, they avoid the conflict rather than confront it (Holley, Haase, & Levenson, 2013). And it seems to work for them. Similarly, in many cultures (and in many specific conflict encounters), avoidance—especially avoiding conflict in public—may be a face-saving strategy and may prove useful in resolving conflict and in preserving the relationship (Cai & Fink, 2002; Jandt, 2021).
Solution
The text you provided is a detailed explanation of conflict avoidance and its effects on relationships. It explains that conflict avoidance can be physical, such as leaving the scene, or psychological, such as not addressing the issues at hand. This behavior often leads to decreased satisfaction in relationships. The text also discusses the demand-withdrawal pattern, where one person makes demands and the other withdraws from the interaction. This pattern is unproductive and can be broken by either party not making demands or actively participating in conflict management.
However, the text also points out that avoidance is not always negative. Taking time to cool off can be a useful strategy, especially in conflicts that occur over email or social media. Delaying a response can allow for more logical and calm thinking, leading to more constructive responses and potential resolutions.
The text also notes that as couples age, they tend to avoid conflict rather than confront it, and this seems to work for them. In many cultures, avoiding public conflict can be a face-saving strategy and can help in resolving conflict and preserving relationships.
Similar Questions
According to our textbook, avoidance occurs when you do not __________ the conflict.
Which conflict resolution strategy involves temporarily satisfying one's own needs while neglecting the needs of others?a.Collaborationb.Competitionc.Accommodationd.Avoidance
avoidance as a coping mechanism
An avoidance approach to conflict... 1 pointIs the best response when the other party is adopting an aggressive approach to conflict.Is characterized by the two conflicted parties settling for a compromise instead of trying to find an integrative "win-win" solution.May be used on occasion to postpone conflict resolution to a later, more appropriate time
Which conflict management style involves intentionally staying away from the conflict? Collaborative. Competing. Avoiding. Compromising.
Upgrade your grade with Knowee
Get personalized homework help. Review tough concepts in more detail, or go deeper into your topic by exploring other relevant questions.