High concentrations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome have been described in wastewater and sewage sludge. It raises the question of the security of land sludge disposal practices during a pandemic. This study aimed to compare SARS-CoV-2's resistance to the main inactivating factors in sludge treatments, pH and heat, to that of native wastewater somatic coliphages. The latest can be easily used as an indicator of treatment efficiency in the field. The effects of heat treatment and pH on the survival of SARS-CoV-2 and somatic coliphages were investigated in simple media. The T90 value (time required for a 90% reduction in the virus or a 1 × log10 decline) at 50 °C was about 4 min for infectious SARS-CoV-2, and around 133 min for infectious somatic coliphages, with no decrease in SARS-CoV-2 genome. For infectious SARS-CoV-2, a slight decrease (<1 log10 unit) was observed at pH 9 or 10 for 10 min; the decrease was over 5 log10 units at pH 11. However, both SARS-CoV-2 genome and infectious somatic coliphages decreased by less than 1 log10 unit at pH 12. All thermal or pH-based treatments that can remove or significantly reduce infectious somatic coliphages (>4 log10) can be considered efficient treatments for infectious SARS-CoV-2. We concluded that somatic coliphages can be considered highly conservative and easy to use indicators of the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 during treatments based on heat and alkaline pH. list the conclusions

As for the SARS coronavirus in the 2003 epidemic, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 has been demonstrated in faeces and, in some cases, urine of infected people, as well as in wastewater. This paper proposes a critical review of the state of the art regarding studies on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater and sewage sludge, the factors affecting its inactivation and the main proposed treatments. In-vitro tests demonstrated low resistance of SARS-CoV-2 to high temperature, while even significant changes in pH would not seem to determine the disappearance of the virus. In real wastewater and in sewage sludge, to date studies on the influence of the different parameters on the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 are not available. Therefore, studies involving other HCoVs such as SARS-CoV and HCoV-229E have been also considered, in order to formulate a hypothesis regarding its behaviour in sewage and throughout the steps of biological treatments in WWTPs. Finally, SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater might track the epidemic trends: although being extremely promising, an effective and wide application of this approach requires a deeper knowledge of the amounts of viruses excreted through the faeces and the actual detectability of viral RNA in sewage tell me conclusions of the text one by one

SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological agent of COVID-19. Most of SARS-CoV-2 carriers are assumed to exhibit no or mild non-specific symptoms. Thus, they may contribute to the rapid and mostly silent circulation of the virus among humans. Since SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in stool samples it has recently been proposed to monitor SARS-CoV-2 in wastewaters (WW) as a complementary tool to investigate virus circulation in human populations. In the present work we assumed that the quantification of SARS-CoV-2 genomes in wastewaters should correlate with the number of symptomatic or non-symptomatic carriers. To test this hypothesis, we performed a time-course quantitative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR in raw wastewater samples collected from several major wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) of the Parisian area. The study was conducted from 5 March to 23 April 2020, therefore including the lockdown period in France (since 17 March 2020). We confirmed that the increase of genome units in raw wastewaters accurately followed the increase of human COVID-19 cases observed at the regional level. Of note, the viral genomes could be detected before the beginning of the exponential growth of the epidemic. As importantly, a marked decrease in the quantities of genomes units was observed concomitantly with the reduction in the number of new COVID-19 cases which was an expected consequence of the lockdown. A s a conclusion, this work suggests that a quantitative monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 genomes in wastewaters should bring important and additional information for an improved survey of SARS-CoV-2 circulation at the local or regional scale.list the conclusions

Concerns about possible secondary transmission of the novel SARS-CoV-2 via water are growing with the evidence of its fecal elimination. Moreover, the results of in vitro experiments of prolonged virus survival with declining temperatures suggest that coronavirus excreted in feces could reach wastewater treatment plants in an infective state, especially in cool climates. However, current knowledge is very scarce and fragmentary. Prior to COVID19, interest in this topic was very low owing to the common belief that enveloped viruses cannot survive for extended periods in water. However, the assumption that SARS-CoV-2 is not involved in environmental circulation cannot be accepted without better knowledge, as highlighted by the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater by six different global research groups. The ongoing SARS-CoV-2 emergency and its rapid spread demands new attention on its detection in water. The scarcity of information on the presence and persistence of coronavirus in the environment merits urgent research. In the meantime, we should respond to the ongoing pandemic by taking precautions and assume that there is a potential for secondary transmission. In particular, we believe that research should address the following:Set up efficient methods to concentrate and detect enveloped viruses (and coronavirus in particular) from water matrices;  Evaluate the survival of these viruses in natural conditions, at different temperatures and in different types of water;  Assess the efficiency of water treatments and disinfection to avoid contamination from urban and hospital wastewater;  Evaluate the implications for water reuse for agriculture including the possibility of food (raw vegetables) contamination;  Establish a surveillance system through sewage monitoring of the potential virus circulation. list the conclusions

, we review the current knowledge related to the potential of wastewater surveillance to understand the epidemiology of COVID-19, methodologies for the detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater, and information relevant for human health risk assessment of SARS-CoV-2. There has been growing evidence of gastrointestinal symptoms caused by SARS-CoV-2 infections and the presence of viral RNA not only in feces of infected individuals but also in wastewater. One of the major challenges in SARS-CoV-2 detection/quantification in wastewater samples is the lack of an optimized and standardized protocol. Currently available data are also limited for conducting a quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for SARS-CoV-2 exposure pathways. However, modeling-based approaches have a potential role to play in reducing the impact of the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak. Furthermore, QMRA parameters obtained from previous studies on relevant respiratory viruses help to inform risk assessments of SARS-CoV-2. Our understanding on the potential role of wastewater in SARS-CoV-2 transmission is largely limited by knowledge gaps in its occurrence, persistence, and removal in wastewater. There is an urgent need for further research to establish methodologies for wastewater surveillance and understand the implications of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. list the conclusions

The results of this study indicate that coronaviruses are much more sensitive to temperature than PV-1 and that there is a considerable difference in survivability between PV-1 and the coronaviruses in wastewater. This may bedue in part to the fact that enveloped viruses are less stable in the environment than nonenveloped viruses. Coronaviruses die off very rapidly in wastewater, with a 99.9% reduction in 2–3 days, which is comparable to the data on SARS-CoV survival (Wang et al. 2005a, b). Survival of the coronaviruses in primary wastewater was only slightly longer than secondary wastewater, probably due to the higher level of suspended solids that offer protection from inactivation. PV-1 survived substantially longer than coronaviruses, requiring 10 days for a comparable reduction in primary wastewater and 5 days in secondary wastewater. This study demonstrates that the transmission of coronaviruses would be less than enteroviruses in the aqueous environment due to the fact that coronaviruses are more rapidly inactivated in water and wastewater at ambient temperatures. list the conclusions