Parties who are not part of a legal case but have a strong interest in the outcome can petition for permission to submit a document called an ‘amicus brief’ to influence the court’s decision. Legal scholars Paul M. Collins Jr., Pamela C. Corley, and Jesse Hamner argue that judges incorporate language from amicus briefs into their legal rulings based on the brief’s quality of argument, ideological position, and author renown. Consequently, a well-argued amicus brief from an influential author has the potential to -------Which choice most logically completes the text?bring judicial opinion more in line with the views of the legal establishment. eliminatemake legal rulings more socially impactful.eliminateimprove a judge’s knowledge of the law. eliminatechange a judge’s opinion and influence their legal rulings.eliminateScratch Board

Which of the following is true of amicus curiae briefs?*(A) They are used by interest groups to lobby the courts.(B) They are used exclusively by liberals.(C) They are issued only by individual people.(D) They are now unconstitutional.

In documents called judicial opinions, judges explainthe reasoning behind their legal rulings, and in thoseexplanations they sometimes cite and discusshistorical and contemporary philosophers. Legalscholar and philosopher Anita L. Allen argues thatwhile judges are naturally inclined to mentionphilosophers whose views align with their ownpositions, the strongest judicial opinions considerand rebut potential objections; discussingphilosophers whose views conflict with judges’ viewscould therefore _______Which choice most logically completes the text?A) allow judges to craft judicial opinions withoutneeding to consult philosophical works.B) help judges improve the arguments they putforward in their judicial opinions.C) make judicial opinions more comprehensible toreaders without legal or philosophical training.D) bring judicial opinions in line with views that arebroadly held among philosophers.

What does the term "amicus curiae" refer to? Group of answer choicesA) A friend of the court brief submitted by a non-party to the caseC) A legal brief written by one of the parties in a caseB) A dissenting opinion written by a justiceD) A unanimous decision by the Supreme Court

Interest groups sometimes lobby the courts by filing:Group of answer choiceswrits of habeas corpus.writs of certiorari.amicus curiae briefs.ex post facto memoranda.

Which Supreme Court procedure involves justices hearing oral arguments and expert testimony by both parties in a case?A.DeliberationB.Sharing of opinionsC.Judicial reviewD.Public arguments