Politicians, private enterprise, and the media may not present scientific information accurately, such as information about climate change, because:Multiple choice question.they may have an interest in how the information affects them.scientific studies are inherently biasedthere is no scientific information available.

Multiple Select QuestionSelect all that applyScientists and the public often think differently about climate data. Which of these are plausible explanations for this difference?Multiple select question.There is a lot of money invested in disputing scientific evidence.Scientists are more familiar with reading trends in the data.The public has less to loose from climate change than scientists do.Scientists and the public have fundamentally different political viewpoints.It can be easier to ignore or dispute change rather than acknowledge it.

Scientific information is commonly misunderstood by the general public because:Multiple choice question.the media, politicians, and private enterprise do not present the facts in an unbiased manner.scientific papers are poorly written.scientists really do not understand the information either.

What is the major reason for delayed response to climate change?Group of answer choicesThe financial interests of large corporations interfere with our political response to addressing climate changeThere is not enough scientific evidence to prove it is happeningAlthough there is proof that temperatures are increasing, scientists are not entirely certain what causes itAlternative energy sources are expensive and unreliable

. Why do scientists have differing opinions about what the same set of data means?They simply interpret the data differentlyThey have personal beliefs that differAll are correctThey are biased by their educationThey are influenced by their employer or funding source

Why would a political scientist wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?A.To question his or her beliefs about an eventB.To identify a research question to pursueC.To corroborate a primary source's claim about an eventD.To confirm his or her own biases about a subject